Is Anti-Semitism Sufficient in Explaining the Holocaust Article

Jessica Lear

HR100

Rachel Duffett

Can be anti-semitism a sufficient explanation pertaining to the Holocaust?

The " final solution” meant the systematic removal of millions of Jews and also other undesirables in Germany and the occupied and conquered areas. Obviously anti-Semitism was extremely important since millions of Jews had been murdered through this act of Genocide. Nevertheless other factors are usually important in understanding how these kinds of a considerable act of racial hatred can be possible in a Western european country including Germany. To ascertain whether anti-Semitism was satisfactory enough in understanding the holocaust one must look at both the world wars, the development of ideology, ‘aryanization', persecution and competitors to the plan and finally background as the cause of anti-semitism. The wars are important understand reasons for the Holocaust mainly because they changed the circumstances substantially and had significant impact on making the holocaust possible. Firstly the outcome in the First Community War is very important in understanding if anti-Semitism is actually a sufficient explanation for the holocaust. The Treaty of Versailles fixed in 1919 had meant that Germany dropped a lot of territory towards the allies such as the Polish Hallway and all international colonies. The war guilt clause also meant that Australia took the blame for the war. Even so Hitler did not believe this to be appropriate and even blamed the outcome in the treaty for the Jews somewhat justifying the later extermination of the Jews. Hitler desired living space pertaining to the Germans in the policy of lebensraum and gaining the areas that were misplaced in the treaty of Versailles would provide this. Therefore the Ww2 can be described as an outcome in the first. Hitler's idea that area lost was Germany's and lebensraum meant that foreign insurance plan became among expansionism that helped initiate the Second Globe War. Moreover the Second World War meant that the holocaust was made straight more conceivable. Probably better, and most essential, in understanding if anti-Semitism can be described as sufficient description for the Holocaust may be the Second World War. The war resulted in world judgment was significantly less important and privacy was easier. Which means building of concentration and death camps became easier and genocide was made even more possible. Furthermore the warfare accelerated the advantages of the quality of the ‘Jewish question' seeing that, for one reason, even more Jews had been becoming underneath German regulation. For instance following Germany overcome Poland the amount of Jews increased under the Third Reich's regulation from not anymore a few 100 thousand but for more than two and a half million1. Since even more Jewish individuals were now beneath the Third Reich the problem boomed to epic proportions. At first deportation, such as the strategies to deport Jews to Madagascar, was the most likely remedy. However it seems that such ideas were not satisfactory enough in regards to economic and military goals. It was not until early spring 1941 that plans started for the ‘biological extermination' of the Jews in which all those unable to work would be permitted to die and others who were ready were to be deported2. Since these plans failed and other strategies similar, just like further programs for expulsion, became fewer possible in conjunction with the extension of conflict the Jews became increasingly more of a burden for the Third Reich. Because the warfare continued even more Jews started to be part of this burden and the problem escalated. It expense to keep these people alive as more money was needed for the war work keeping these people was maybe not enough. Deportation was also high priced and harder as the Jewish inhabitants in the Third Reich elevated. Therefore repellent may would be the only option and if the war had not existed then simply deportation or perhaps other means may have been a more viable, and humane, option. The conflict also supposed escalated brutality towards the Jews. It can be said that the battle with the east front, or Operation Barbarossa, was the turning point in improved violence towards Jews therefore...

Bibliography: Primary Sources

Instruction from Foreign Office on removing Jews from German existence, 25 January 1939' in Steve Hochstadt (ed), Types of the Holocaust, (Hampshire/New You are able to, 2004).

‘Bavarian petition other equality to get Jews, 15 January 1850', in Steve Hochstadt (ed), Sources of the Holocaust, (Hampshire, New York: 2004).

Secondary Resources

Aly, Gotz, ‘Final Solution' Nazi Inhabitants Policy as well as the Murder from the European Jews, (London, 1999).

Avraham Barkai, ‘Volksgemeinschaft, ‘aryanization' and the holocaust', in David Ceserani (ed), The Final Remedy Origins and Implementation, (London, 1994).

Omer Bartov, ‘Operation Barbarossa plus the Origins in the Final Solution' in David Ceserani (ed), The Final Remedy Origins and Implementation, (London, 1994).

Briggs, Asa, Clavin, Patricia, Contemporary Europe 1789-Present, 2nd edition (Great Great britain, 2003).

Captain christopher R. Browning ‘Hitler and the Euphoria of Victory The way to the Final Solution' in David Ceserani (ed), The Final Solution Origins and Implementation, (London, 1994).

Heywood, Andrew, Political Ideologies, An Introduction, (Hampshire/New York: 3 rd Ed 2003).

Why Was It the Allies Rather Than Germany Who Achieved a Breakthrough and Victory in 1918? Research Paper